Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

170 Tex. Crim. 16

336 S.W.2d 944

Slaughter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1960-06-25

Relies on 136 Tex. Crim. 498 - Cooper v. State · McCarty v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1960-06-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1985

5 state decisions

30196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WOODLEY, Judge

¶1 On a former day of this term the judgment of conviction herein was affirmed and appellant’s first and second motions for rehearing were overruled.

¶2 Our attention has now been called to what appears to be a fatal defect in the jury’s verdict. Our prior opinions are therefore withdrawn and the following substituted.

¶3*17 The third count of the indictment alleged the unlawful possession of ethyl morphine, a narcotic drug.

¶4 The verdict of the jury which the trial court received and upon which the judgment of conviction was based recites that the jury found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment “at confinement in the State Penitentiary for Five (5).”

¶5 The verdict assessed no definite punishment and for that reason is fatally defective. Cooper v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 498, 126 S.W. 2d 974; McCarty v. State, 317 S.W. 2d 748; Bumpass v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. R. 423, 271 S.W 2d 953

¶6 The authorities cited are controlling and require that the conviction be set aside.

¶7 The order affirming the conviction is set aside and the judgment is now reversed and the cause remanded.

/170/texcrim/16 · .json · Public domain