Saunders v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on City of San Antonio v. Micklejohn · The People v. Vaughn · 22 Tex. Civ. App. 309 - El Paso Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of El Paso · Cook v. State · 158 Tex. Crim. 471 - Ferrantello v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nowhere in our statutes may the requirement be found which demands that witnesses who testify before the Legislature or any of its committees shall be sworn. Article 5429a, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., merely empowers members of the Legislature to administer oaths to witnesses who appear before either House or a committee thereof and does no more than add members of the Legislature to those enumerated in Article 26, V.A.C.S., as those who are authorized to administer oaths. Can it be said that an oath administered by any of those persons . .. enumerated in Articles 26 or 5429a, supra, is, per se, one which is required by law? We think not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Douglas“The cases which have been before this court wherein a conviction for perjury was authorized upon a false affidavit or statement outside of and unconnected with a judicial proceeding are based upon the proposition that there must exist a valid statute, a valid law, which requires the making of the affidavit or statement under oath.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Douglas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.