Logsdon v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Continental Ore Company v. Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation · MacMaugh v. Baldwin · Simmonds v. Capital Transit Co. · Ada M. Reece and Charles Reece v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation, Capital Transit Company, a Corporation v. Ada M. Reece and Charles Reece · 366 F. Supp. 332 - Logsdon v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“purportedly evident in photographs taken at the scene. Neither the district judge nor we can discern the marks in the photos. Even if they had been present, only a rather attenuated assumption could link the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Logsdon v. Baker“to formulate his conclusion, we would agree that the opinion produced would be too speculative to go to the jury. But from the record, we cannot discern whether it was necessary for the expert to rely on the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Logsdon v. Baker“with this particular truck. If the expert relied on the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Logsdon v. Baker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.