Anderson v. Sisson’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2004
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. Koplar · Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch Inc. · Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co. · Klein v. Beeten · Linberg v. Stanto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A presumption of negligence from the simple occurrence of an accident arises where the accident proceeds from an act of such a character that, when due care is taken in its performance, no injury ordinarily ensues from it in similar cases, or where it is caused by the mismanagement or misconstruction of a thing over which the defendant has immediate control, or for the management or construction of which he is responsible.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Darden v. Murphy““ * * * when read as a whole, the instruction can hardly fail to convey the idea that the burden, which was shifted to the defendant by the plaintiff’s proof of the facts therein recited required no more than proof on her part that she did ‘everything that a reasonably prudent person would do, under all the facts and circumstances of the case,’ to prevent the injury,” * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Darden v. Murphy““The Trauerman Case has been cited with approval in two other cases, Sisson v. Anderson, supra ( 165 Va. 629 , 183 S. E. 431 ), and L. Bromm Baking Co. v. West, 166 Va. 357 , 186 S. E. 289 . No distinction between the burden of proof and the burden of going forward with the evidence was attempted or discussed in any of the three cases.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Darden v. Murphy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.