State v. Stubbs’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 126 Wash. 2d 388 - State v. Ritchie · 106 Wash. 2d 547 - State v. Armstrong · 117 Wash. 2d 211 - State v. Grewe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the reasons supplied by the sentencing court are not supported by the record.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“is not qualitatively different than another case. Such a leap is best understood as the jump from `bodily harm' to `substantial bodily harm,' or from `substantial bodily harm' to `great bodily harm.' That is what is meant by ` substantially exceeds.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may impose a sentence outside the standard sentence range for an offense if it finds . . . that there are substantial and compelling reasons justifying an exceptional sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.