Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 WASH2D 746 - State v. Schultz

State v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 101 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Allery · State v. Ferrier · State v. Kinzy · State v. Acrey · 75 Wash. App. 351 - State v. Menz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to assure the victim of domestic violence the maximum protection from abuse which the law and those who enforce the law can provide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Schultz] was highly emotional and agitated, talking quickly, was flushed and told the officer that she was upset.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was highly emotional, talking fast, flushed in the face, and she told Officer [Kori] Malone that she was upset.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.