Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 WIS 487 - Steinkrause v. Eckstein

Steinkrause v. Eckstein’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
September 1978
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 1978

21 state decisions

100192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lauson v. Town of Fond du Lac · Ellis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. · Farrington v. Cheponis · Pinoza v. Northern Chair Co. · Pizzo v. Wiemann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On the first question, no precise definition of what is intoxication is made by the statute, nor will we undertake in that behalf to do more than say that it is evidently intended that the fact must appear that the driver’s indulgence in the use of intoxicating liquors was such as to result in an appreciable interference with the exercise by him of ordinary care in the management of such vehicle.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.