Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 Wis. 2d 130 - State v. Perez

170 Wis. 2d 130 - State v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 227 Wis. 2d 167 - State v. Watson (1999), State v. Groth (2002)

42 state decisions

220199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porter v. States · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 144 Wis. 2d 388 - State v. Schumacher · United States v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To safeguard the accuracy of the PSI, the probation and parole agent preparing the report must be neutral and independent of either the prosecution or defense. .. .The PSI's author is acting exclusively on behalf of an independent judiciary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To protect the integrity of the sentencing process, the court must base its decision on reliable information. Several safeguards have been developed which effectively protect the due process right of a defendant to be sentenced on the basis of true and correct information. The defendant and defense counsel are allowed access to the presentence investigation report and are given the opportunity to refute what they allege to be inaccurate information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he defendant has the opportunity to file his own presen-tence memorandum with the court which can present what the defendant believes to be true and correct information the court should rely upon in sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.