170 Wis. 2d 272 - State v. Flores’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2014
2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 92 Wis. 2d 797 - State v. MacHner · 168 Wis. 2d 509 - State v. Knight · 158 Wis. 2d 636 - State v. Flores
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s to a communication relevant to an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to the lawyer's client or by the client to the client's lawyer”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hen a defendant charges that his or her attorney has been ineffective, the defendant's lawyer-client privilege is waived to the extent that counsel must answer questions relevant to the charge of ineffective assistance. Section 905.03(4)(c), Stats., specifically states that there is no lawyer-client privilege '[a]s to a communication relevant to an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to his [or her] client or by the client to his [or her] lawyer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While we recognize that this appellate court did not”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kethley v. Berge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.