170 Wis. 2d 608 - State v. Neudorff’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2025
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 53 Wis. 2d 751 - Champlain v. State · 118 Wis. 2d 339 - State v. Wickstrom · 65 Wis. 2d 331 - Bailey v. State · 83 Wis. 2d 368 - Whitaker v. State · 140 Wis. 2d 411 - State v. Flakes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so related to the transaction and facts adduced at the preliminary hearing [that] a defendant cannot be heard to say that he or she is surprised by the new charge since the preparation for the new charge would be no different than the preparation for the old charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“undeniably related to the transaction or facts considered at the preliminary hearing ... if there is no adequate notice of that charge, the prosecution cannot be legally sustained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Notice to the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusations is a key factor in determining whether an amended charging document has prejudiced a defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.