In re Marcus E.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Thomas H. · In Re Scott S. · In Re Robert S. · In re I.S. · In Re Rachel J.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although [at the termination hearing] the court was required to make its unfitness and best interest determinations by a higher standard of proof than its findings in earlier stages of the proceedings, including the jeopardy stage, the same judge presided over nearly the entirety of these child protective proceedings and was entitled to consider the evidence presented throughout.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Kaysean M.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.