¶1The defendant neglected his opportunity to appeal from the order until, by agreement with his wife, he was enabled to embarrass the recovery of compensation by plaintiff’s counsel. For this reason the order should be affirmed without expression of opinion as to the right of the attorney to base a recovery for his services upon the order. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
171 A.D. 930
Howe v. Howe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1915
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1915-11-15
Decided 1915-11-15