171 Ala. 391
Decided April 5, 1911
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1911-04-05
Heard before Hon. E. J. Garrison. Action by Mrs. W. F. Conway as guardian, against T. E. Clark and another upon certain promissory notes. Judgment-for defendant and plaintiff appeals. Counsel discuss certain assignments of errors with citation of •authority, but in view of what is said in the opinion, it is not deemed necessary to set them out.
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1916
4 state decisions
Relies on Wright v. State · Thayer v. State · Sivoly v. Scott
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Appeal ■dismissed · Decided 1911-04-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In this case no judgment appears in the record proper, and according to repeated decisions of this court the recital of the judgment in the bill of exceptions cannot be considered. — Sivoly v. Scott et al., 56 Ala. 555, 557; Wright v. State, 136 Ala. 139, 145, 34 South. 233; Street et al. v. Frank, 136 Ala. 616, 33 South. 879; Thayer v. State, 138 Ala. 39, 48, 35 South. 406.
¶2The appeal is dismissed.