Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Ariz. 333 - State v. Peterson

State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary · Arizona v. Hicks · St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South Dakota · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Any evidence that is seized pursuant to a search warrant shall not be suppressed as a result of a violation of this chapter except as required by the United States Constitution and the constitution of this state. B. If a party in a criminal proceeding seeks to exclude evidence from the trier of fact because of the conduct of a peace officer in obtaining the evidence, the proponent of the evidence may urge that the peace officer’s conduct was taken in a reasonable, good faith belief that the conduct was proper and that the evidence discovered should not be kept from the trier of fact if otherwise admissible. C. The trial court shall not suppress evidence that is otherwise admissible in a criminal proceeding if the court determines that the evidence was seized by a peace officer as a result of a good faith mistake or technical violation. F. For the purposes of this section: 1. “Good faith mistake” means a reasonable judgmental error concerning the existence of facts that if true would be sufficient to constitute probable cause. 2. “Technical violation” means a reasonable good faith reliance on: (b) A warrant that is later invalidated due to a good faith mistake.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.