Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 ARIZ 431 - State v. Downing

State v. Downing’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · Mathews v. United States · Anderson v. Charles · State v. Correll · State v. Mathers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the [prosecutorial] conduct which took place in this case is so clearly proscribed by the law, and because it was not inadvertent nor a single occurrence, we find the trial judge erred in denying the motion for mistrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.