Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 ARIZ 572 - State v. Conlin

State v. Conlin’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tumey v. State of Ohio · Ward v. Village of Monroeville · Dugan v. Ohio · Ison v. Western Vegetable Distributors · Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that a superior court judge whose court is funded with monies from the drug enforcement fund does not have a 'direct, personal, substantial, pecuniary interest' in assessing the fine”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[federal] due process right to a fair and impartial adjudication of guilt when the sentencing judge's court is funded in part with monies from the drug enforcement fund.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “payment of fines for drug-related offenses to the drug enforcement fund”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.