Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Cal. App. 2d 206 - Ballard v. Augustine

171 Cal. App. 2d 206 - Ballard v. Augustine’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1961
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co. · Callet v. Alioto · Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co. · Wells v. Lloyd · 20 Cal. 2d 635 - Westover v. City of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining the propriety of an instruction the reviewing court should examine the charge as a whole. [Citations.] If when considered together the instructions are found generally to state the applicable law, reversible error is not necessarily present even though an isolated instruction is defective in not containing all of the essential elements.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.