People v. Babaali’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 19 Cal. 4th 108 - People v. Birks · 19 Cal. 4th 686 - People v. Ortega · 29 Cal. 3d 364 - People v. Lohbauer · 47 Cal. 3d 966 - People v. Toro · 46 Cal. 3d 322 - People v. Kurtzman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny person who touches an intimate part of another person, if the touching is against the will of the person touched, and is for the specific purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification, or sexual abuse, is guilty of misdemeanor sexual battery . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a defendant violates section 243.4, subdivision (c) by making a fraudulent representation that results in the victim's submitting to a specific intimate touching, not by committing an intimate touching against the victim's will.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is at the time unconscious of the nature of the act because the perpetrator fraudulently represented that the touching served a professional purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.