Taylor v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 district · 84 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Pet v. Department of Health Services (1988), Loisel v. Rowe (1995)
2 district · 84 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Weinstein v. Bradford · Kellems v. Brown · Adams v. Rubinow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the decision to grant parole is entirely within the discretion of the board. Indeed, this court squarely has held that, '[t]here is no statutory requirement that the panel [of the board] actually consider the eligibility of any inmate for parole, the statute does not vest an inmate with the right to demand parole, and there is no statutory provision which even permits an inmate to apply for parole.... For even if the inmate has complied with the minimum requirements of [the parole statute], the statute does not require the board to determine his eligibility for parole.' ... Taylor v. Robinson , [ 171 Conn. 691 , 697-98, 372 A.2d 102 (1976) ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may be allowed to go at large on parole in the discretion of the panel of the board of parole for the institution in which the person is confined”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“parole release hearing obviously qualifies as a proceeding `in which a hearing is in fact held'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.