171 Conn. App. 486 - State v. Ames’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · Hullum v. United States · Linn v. United States · Landsberger v. Schafer · In Re KH
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]ntent to cause death may be inferred from the type of weapon used, the manner which it was used, the type of wound inflicted and the events leading to and immediately following the death. ... Furthermore, it is a permissible, albeit not a necessary or mandatory, inference that a defendant intended the natural consequences of his voluntary conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“intent to kill may be inferred from evidence that the defendant had a motive to kill.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.