Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 F.1d 250 - Ex parte Crowder

Ex parte Crowder’s Empirical Analysis

171 F. 250 · 1909

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 1912
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Henry Urquhart v. Thomas Brown · Baker v. Grice · Emert v. State of Missouri · Ex Parte Frederich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““One convicted in a state court for an alleged violation of the criminal statutes of the state, and who contends' that he is held in violation of the Constitution of the United States, must ordinarily first take his case to the highest court of the state, in which the judgment could be reviewed, and thence bring it, if unsuccessful t£ere, to this court by writ of error; that only in certain exceptional cases, of which the present is not one, will a Circuit Court of the United States, or this court upon appeal from a Circuit Court, intervene by writ of habeas corpus in advance of the final action by the highest court of the state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.