In re Leech’s Empirical Analysis
171 F. 622 · 1909
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2013
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tumlin v. Bryan · Lansing Boiler & Engine Works v. Ryerson · First Nat. Bank v. Holt · Louisville Nat. Banking Co. v. Pfaffinger's Trustee · Acme Food Co. v. Meier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““And in the present case, if there had been an issue upon the question of the transferror’s solvency at the time of the transfer, or of reasonable cause to believe on the part of the transferee that the transfer was made with intent to create an unlawful preference, it would have devolved upon the referee, or the judge, to find the facts, so that the reviewing court might apply the law. to the facts found by the court whose findings of fact are final. This case is not peculiar in this respect. We have on several occasions experienced the same difficulties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Throckmorton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.