Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

171 F.2d 143

Docket No. 9672.

Todd v. Todd

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 7, 1948.

Decided Nov. 1, 1948.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1948-11-01

2 counsel of record

Relies on Travers v. Reinhardt · Thomas v. Murphy

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1948-11-01

¶1Mr. M. Edward Buckley, Jr., of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Leo J. Michalowski, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

¶2Mr. William A. Powell, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Harry A. Dyson, of Washington, D. G, was on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The appellee, Phyllis C. Todd, was the plaintiff in the District Court where she sought and obtained a divorce from the appellant, John G. Todd.

¶6The complaint recites that the parties became man and wife about April 15, 1941, under a common law marriage. At that time both John and Phyllis were living in Kansas City, Missouri. John defended in the District Court and appeals to this court on the ground there was no marriage. He admitted having relations with -the appellee in Missouri, but points out that- common law marriages are not recognized in that state and insists there was no valid evidence showing cohibitation in the District of Columbia, an essential in the proof of a common law marriage in this jurisdiction.

¶7There was proof of such cohabitation, however, and the District Court’s decree was in all respects justified by the record. Cf. Travers v. Reinhardt, 1907, 205 U.S. 423, 27 S.Ct. 563, 51 L.Ed. 865; Thomas v. Murphy, 1939, 71 App.D.C. 69, 107 F.2d 268.

¶8Affirmed.

/171/f2d/143 · .json · Public domain