Van Dyke v. Kuhl’s Empirical Analysis
171 F.2d 187 · 1948
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1965
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commissioner v. Sunnen · Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co. · Cleveland v. Higgins · Magruder v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore · Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore v. Magruder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In reaching our conclusion in this case we have not overlooked the fact that § 81.34 of T.R. 105, in effect at the time of the prior litigation between the parties, has since been amended so as to provide that a deduction for attorneys’ fees incurred in prosecuting a claim for refund shall be claimed at the time such refund is prosecuted. That fact does not change our conclusion.” Van Dyke v. Kuhl, supra, 171 F.2d 189 . (The conclusion reached by the Court in the VanDyke case was based upon the principle of res adjudicata.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Plassey v. Kavanagh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.