Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 F.2d 392 - Cunningham v. Olson Drilling Co.

Cunningham v. Olson Drilling Co.’s Empirical Analysis

171 F.2d 392 · 1948

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2008

6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

401948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Century Indemnity Co. v. Arnold · Lemley v. Christophersen · Tombigbee Mill & Lumber Co. v. Hollingsworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is too late to complain of the submission of an issue to the jury after a litigant has taken a chance on what the jury will do and after the jury has resolved the issue against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.