Co-Efficient Foundation, Inc. v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis
171 F.2d 691 · 1948
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2003 · most notably Moore v. United States (1952), Meyercheck v. Givens (1950)
19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Porter v. Warner Holding Co. · Barton v. Barbour · Woods v. Stone · Kohn v. McNulta · Idaho Oregon Land Imp Co v. Bradbury
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The period of limitations provided by 205(e) could have been invoked only as to the recovery sought under that subsection. There is no period of limitation prescribed by subsection (a) and the limitation set up in 205(e) cannot be made applicable to the equitable action under subsection (a) unless in such equitable action under (a) it was sought to enforce some purely legal right.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Meyercheck v. Givens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.