Bocock v. Wabash R.’s Empirical Analysis
171 F.2d 834 · 1949
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Berg v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co. · Provenzano v. Illinois Central Railroad · Morgan v. New York Central R. R. Co. · Stephenson v. Grand Trunk Western R. · Trumbo v. C.B. Q.R.R. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“He (the trial judge) analyzed the evidence in this respect and concluded, rightly we think, that a jury question was presented and that he could not therefore render judgment notwithstanding the verdict as to this issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.