Oddo v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
171 F.2d 854 · 1949
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently April 2003 · most notably United States v. Chiarella (1950), Halfen v. United States (1963)
53 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 548
Relies on Morgan v. Devine · United States v. Smith · Ebeling v. Morgan · Hill v. Hawes · Boykin v. Huff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It would seem .pointless to require notification by the clerk of the court unless the party for whose benefit the provision exists is entitled to rely on receipt of the notice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.