Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 F.2d 921 - Chandler v. United States

Chandler v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

171 F.2d 921 · 1948

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 11 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2021 · most notably Reid v. Covert (1957), United States Ex Rel. Toth v. Quarles (1955)

46 federal appellate · 11 district · 6 state decisions

380194819501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1 · 18 U.S.C. § 2381 · 18 U.S.C. § 3041 · 18 U.S.C. § 3192 · 18 U.S.C. § 3238 · 18 U.S.C. § 591 · 28 U.S.C. § 102

Relies on Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Hirabayashi v. United States · Schenck v. United States · Ker v. People of the State of Illinois · Ford v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The trial of all offenses begun or committed upon the high seas, or elsewhere out of the jurisdiction of any particular State or district, shall be in the district where the offender is found, or into which he is first brought.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the type of criminal statute which is properly presumed to have no extraterritorial application in the absence of statutory language indicating a contrary intent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.