Snapper, Inc. v. Redan’s Empirical Analysis
171 F.3d 1249 · 1999
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 15 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Edwards v. Prime, Inc. (2010), Marshall Huffman v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership (1999)
30 federal appellate · 15 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Catlin v. United States · Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All claims, causes of action, liabilities, and suits relating to the negotiation, formation, construction, interpretation, performance, or enforcement of this Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with Georgia law. At our [CGS] option, jurisdiction and venue for all litigation, arbitration, and mediation related to this Agreement will be proper only in the United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, or the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, depending upon which court has subject matter jurisdiction. You [Plaintiffs] consent to the exercise of in personam jurisdiction by courts.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A motion to remand the case on the basis of any defect in removal procedure must be made within 30 days after the filing of the notice of removal under section 1446(a). If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“dictates an exclusive forum for litigation under the contract,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.