Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 F.3d 1289 - Onishea v. Hopper

Onishea v. Hopper’s Empirical Analysis

171 F.3d 1289 · 1999

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Kaplun v. Attorney General of the United States (2010), John Doe

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

2401999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Bell v. Wolfish · Turner v. Safley · Procunier v. Martinez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “asserted danger of transfer must be rooted in sound medical opinion and not be speculative or fanciful[,] . . . this is not a 'somebody has to die first' standard, either: evidence of actual transmission of the fatal disease in the relevant context is not necessary to a finding of significant risk.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[u]nfortunately, the district court denied the plaintiffs discovery of the source of the Department of Corrections’ federal funding, and the plaintiffs did not pursue questioning on this subject at trial. Thus, with one exception, we do not know what regulations apply to the Department of Corrections. And this matters: Different agency regulations lay out the contours of the reasonable-accommodation principle differently. For instance, Department of Justice regulations require no accommodation at all in nonemployment programs..., while De partment of Labor regulations require reasonable accommodation in employment training programs[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.