Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 F.3d 636 - United States v. Sumner

United States v. Sumner’s Empirical Analysis

171 F.3d 636 · 1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2014

4 federal appellate ·

20199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2111

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Hernandez · Mendoza v. Brown · United States v. Leisure · United States v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no reasonable probability that the verdict would have been different had the results of the fingerprint analysis been made known to Sumner prior to trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.