Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 F.3d 757 - Montero v. Travis

Montero v. Travis’s Empirical Analysis

171 F.3d 757 · 1999

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
4
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 11 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Huminski v. Corsones (2004), Walczyk v. Rio (2007)

12 federal appellate · 11 district · 5 state decisions

5001999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Imbler v. Pachtman · Butz v. Economou · Stump v. Sparkman · Denton v. Hernandez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “serve a quasi-adjudicative function in deciding whether to grant, deny or revoke parole.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] parole board official is absolutely immune from liability for damages when he decides to grant, deny, or revoke parole, because this task is functionally comparable to that of a judge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.