Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 FSUPP 127 - Buining v. the Transporter

Buining v. the Transporter’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

10 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2001

10 district · 2 state decisions

100195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on May v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Bell v. Novick Transfer Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““9(b). What medical authority or authorities does the Defendant’s experts contend will sustain his opinion as given in his reports.” Objection sustained. “10. If Defendant has consulted or obtained a written report from an expert it does not propose to call as a witness, name said expert and identify his profession or specialty.” Objection sustained. “13. Describe in detail the physical appearance and condition of Plaintiff immediately after the occurrence of the casualty complained of herein.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““14. If Defendant has any evidence or information that the injuries, damages and disabilities alleged to have been suffered by Plaintiff as a result of the casualty complained of herein, were caused, aggravated or precipitated by any pri- or or subsequent injury, disease, sickness or other condition, specify the nature and extent of such information and give a concise statement of the facts upon which Defendant will rely to establish such causation, aggravation or precipitation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “****** “6. What are the names, permanent mailing addresses, ‘Z’ numbers, ratings or job classifications, ship watches and present whereabouts of the members of the crew of the USNS Tonti for the voyage involved in this action? “a. Of which country were the men mentioned above citizens ? “b. When did the men mentioned above join the USNS Tonti as a member of the crew?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.