171 F. Supp. 2d 203 - Strother v. Harte’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 3401 (Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978) · 12 U.S.C. § 3416 · 12 U.S.C. § 3417 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · Kronisch v. United States · Discon Incorporated v. Nynex Corporation J
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”). 2 . See, e.g., Leveraged Leasing Admin. Corp. v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 , 47 (2d Cir. 1996) (allegation of individual plaintiffs’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.