¶1This case falls within the familiar rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and the law and facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge. • There was no abuse of discretion, and the law and facts did not require the verdict in the present case. Civil Code (1910), § 6204. Judgment affirmed.
171 Ga. 519
Tyus v. Collier
Decided December 9, 1930
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1930-12-09
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1951
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1930-12-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →