Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

171 Ga. App. 568

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1984

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1984-07-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1991

1 state decisions

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Anders v. California · Bethay v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-07-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Carley, Judge.

¶1Appellant appeals from his conviction of robbery and simple battery. Appointed counsel for appellant has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief rais*569ing points of law which arguably could support the appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently whether any errors of law occurred. We find that the points raised are without merit, and our independent examination discloses no errors requiring reversal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw, and we affirm appellant’s conviction. We are satisfied from our review of the record that any rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).

Decided July 13, 1984.Richard M. Loftis, for appellant.Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Susan Brooks, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.
/171/gaapp/568 · .json · Public domain