Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 ILL 462 - Hoeffer v. Clogan

Hoeffer v. Clogan’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
10
states following
May 1954
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 1954 · most notably Harrington v. Pier (1900), Congregational Sunday School & Publishing Society v. Board of Review (1919)

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1301898190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Francois Fenelon v. The Mayor Aldermen and Citizens of Philadelphia · Tilden v. . Green · Holland v. . Alcock · Crerar v. Williams · Heuser v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A charity, in the legal sense, may be more fully defined as a gift, to be applied consistently with existing laws, for the benefit of an indefinite number of persons, either by bringing their minds or hearts under the influence of education or religion, by relieving their bodies from disease, suffering or constraint, by assisting them to establish themselves in life, or by erecting or maintaining publie buildings or works or otherwise lessening the burdens of government. It is immaterial whether the purpose is called charitable in the gift itself, if it is so described as to show that it is charitable in its nature.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.