171 Ill. App. 3d 93 - People v. Tylkowski’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 201 Ill. App. 3d 207 - People v. Williams (1990), 228 Ill. App. 3d 12 - People v. Wilhoite (1991)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 101 Ill. 2d 147 - People v. Silagy · 97 Ill. 2d 151 - People v. Winters · 63 Ill. App. 3d 510 - People v. Spears · 102 Ill. App. 3d 414 - People v. Clark · 138 Ill. App. 3d 106 - People v. Moffitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Defendant contends that it appears from his confession that, while he did not have license plates, he had a receipt showing that he had applied for the plates displayed on his windshield. He argues that, therefore, the police were not justified in stopping him. However, the only way the officers could determine that defendant did have a valid receipt on his windshield was by stopping him to check. The fact that there was no evidence that the officers ever determined whether the defendant had applied for plates does not invalidate defendant’s arrest in light of the fact that upon stopping defendant, the officers discovered that he was carrying a weapon and driving without a license. Accordingly, we conclude that the officers’ investigatory stop was warranted and that defendant’s subsequent arrest was not illegal.” Tylkowski, 171 Ill. App. 3d at 98-99 , 524 N.E.2d at 1116 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.