Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 MICH 282 - People v. Case

People v. Case’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2004

12 state decisions

401912192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scanlon v. Walshe · Bowman v. Little · Smith v. Henline · Egbert v. Greenwalt · Mink v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule that a child born in lawful wedlock will be presumed to be legitimate is as old as the common law. It is one of the strongest presumptions in the law. The ancient rule made the presumption conclusive, if the husband was within the four seas. The modern one permits the presumption to be overcome, but only upon proof which is very convincing.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.