Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

171 Minn. 334

214 N.W 260

State v. Lindquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1927

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1927-05-20

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-05-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1978

5 state decisions

20192719301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 On Petition for Rehearing.

¶2 On June 3, 1927, the following opinion was filed:

Per Curiam.

¶3 The petition for a rehearing must be denied, but to clear up an *338 apparent doubt as to the scope of the decision we take occasion to say that the only points determined are set forth in the syllabus. Whether the ordinance requiring plasterers and stucco workers in the city of Minneapolis to obtain a license from the city council to carry on their business is valid is a question left open for determination when it is directly presented to this court. The question was not raised or discussed in the briefs and was not considered by the court in disposing of the appeal.

/171/minn/334 · .json · Public domain