Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Mo. 231 - Patton v. Smith

Patton v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2002

7 state decisions

4019021910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n · State v. Bixman · Aull v. St. Louis Trust Co. · Schad v. Sharp · McCabe v. Bruere

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In 1883 Remelius became the owner of both tracts, and the evidence shows that, when some question arose thereafter as to the location of the survey line, he said it made no difference, inasmuch as he owned all the land on both sides of the line, wherever it might be. So that even if the possession of Kennedy had been hostile to Remelius, and even if Kennedy had intended to claim to the line established as the survey line by [the county surveyor], without regard to whether that was the true line or not, and even if Kennedy and Remelius had agreed upon the line established by [the county surveyor], nevertheless, when Remelius became the owner of both tracts of land, all such questions became immaterial. There was no adverse holding thereafter by Remelius as the owner of one tract against himself as the owner of the other tract, and there was no longer any question of any agreed line dividing the two tracts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen Remelius became the owner of both tracts, he wiped out and abandoned any agreed dividing line, if there ever was one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.