171 N.C. App. 71 - State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · State v. Morgan · State v. Autry · 3 Misc. 3d 739 - People v. Moscat · 164 N.C. App. 272 - State v. Forrest
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A violation of the defendant's rights under the Constitution of the United States is prejudicial unless the appellate court finds that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden is upon the State to demonstrate, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the error was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]e [then] must determine . . . whether the trial court properly ruled the declarant was unavailable[ ] and . . . whether defendant had an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] 911 call can usually be seen as part of the criminal incident itself, rather than as part of the prosecution that follows.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.