State v. Stott’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he right against self-incrimination, and the corollary requirement that a suspect be informed of that right, are triggered “when an individual is taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his [or her] freedom by the authorities in any significant way and is subject to questioning[.]” Miranda, supra, 384 U.S. at 478, 86 S.Ct. at 1630, 16 L.Ed.2d at 726. The requirement that interrogators warn suspects of certain rights is deemed necessary due to the pressure inherent in an “incommunicado interrogation of individuals in a police-dominated atmospheref.]” Id. at 445, 86 S.Ct at 1612, 16 L.Ed.2d at 707. [Stott, supra, 171 N.J. at 364 , 794 A.2d 120 .]”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 352 N.J. Super. 338 - State v. Brown · State v. O'NEAL

2. “ensure the patients are not in a position to harm either themselves or others.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 362 N.J. Super. 600 - State v. Diloreto · 367 N.J. Super. 229 - Rm v. Northern Regional Unit

3. “critical determinant of custody is whether there has been a significant deprivation of the suspect's freedom of action based on the objective circumstances.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 352 N.J. Super. 338 - State v. Brown · State Ex Rel. Jdh