Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

171 N.J. Super. 181

408 A.2d 444

Spialter v. Testa

MILLARD SPIALTER T/A LINDSLEY ARMS APARTMENTS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PETER TESTA, LOUISE TESTA, AND ANTHONY TESTA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Argued October 9, 1979.

Decided November 8, 1979.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1979-11-08

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1992

5 state decisions

Relies on 162 N.J. Super. 421 - Spialter v. Testa

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-11-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before Judges BISCHOFF and DWYER.

¶2Mr. Philip I. Levitan, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Menza and Levitan, attorneys).

¶3Respondents did not file a brief.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The judgment of the Morris County District Court here under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge MacKenzie in his written opinion reported in Spialter v. Testa,162 N.J. Super. 421 (D.Ct. 1978).

/171/njsuper/181 · .json · Public domain