Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 N.J. Super. 240 - State v. Pace

171 N.J. Super. 240 - State v. Pace’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2015

21 state decisions

10019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Barker v. Wingo · Simmons v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, the sweeping language of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Chadwick, supra, [ 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 538 (1977)] and its progeny, especially Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 , 99 S.Ct. 2586 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 235 (1979), establishes principles which mandate a contrary result. [ Id. at 247, 408 A. 2d 808 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]ere we approaching this issue as one of first impression, we might be persuaded that this position has merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.