State v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1989
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Whitaker · State v. Low · 153 N.J. Super. 399 - State v. Duswalt · 52 N.J. Super. 378 - State v. Baechlor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any case pending on or initiated after the effective date of the code involving an offense committed prior to such date: (1) The procedural provisions of the Code shall govern, insofar as they are justly applicable and their application does not introduce confusion or delay; * * * [emphasis added]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Molnar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.