¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Howard v. Ludwig (171 N. Y. 507); no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.
171 N.Y. 676
64 N.E 1125
Decided June 17, 1902
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1902-06-17
<p>Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 21, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying- a motion for a new trial.</p>
Relies on Howard v. . Ludwig
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1902-06-17
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1926
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Howard v. Ludwig (171 N. Y. 507); no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.