Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Ohio App. 3d 473 - State v. Terry

171 Ohio App. 3d 473 - State v. Terry’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2020

6 state decisions

20200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · State v. Foster · State v. Barnhouse · Akers v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(B)(1) A jail term or sentence of imprisonment for a misdemeanor shall be served consecutively to any other prison term, jail term, or sentence of imprisonment *Page 5 when the trial court specifies that it is to be served consecutively or when it is imposed for a misdemeanor violation of section 2907.322 , 2921.34 , or 2923.131 of the Revised Code. {¶ 12} "When consecutive sentences are imposed for misdemeanor under this division, the term to be served is the aggregate of the consecutive terms imposed, except that the aggregate term to be served shall not exceed eighteen months.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “R.C. 2929.41 (B) is still constitutional and has not been severed from the remaining statutory provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is unconstitutional and no longer exists after Foster[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.