Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Ohio App. 3d 563 - State v. Mutter

171 Ohio App. 3d 563 - State v. Mutter’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2020

6 state decisions

40200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cook · Buchanan v. Warley · City of Norwood v. Horney · Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Picklo · Parham v. Justices of the Inferior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we have no difficulty in continuing to view an owner and occupier of residential property as possessing a substantive right to continue to own and occupy that property. That right, venerable though it may be, may be taken away prospectively. Thus, we have no difficulty with the application of R.C. § 2950.031 to a person who commits a sexual offense after the effective date of the statute, just as we would have no difficulty with taking away that person’s liberty, for a statutorily proscribed period of time, after being convicted of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A purely remedial statute does not violate Section 28 , Article II of the Ohio Constitution, even if applied retroactively.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the word `remedial' has a different meaning in the context of * * * an ex post facto law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.